IVPN vs Private Internet Access
Side-by-side comparison based on Reddit & Twitter discussions
Community Pick
IVPN
Based on community sentiment and discussions
IVPN
Winner
Approval Rate
90%
45 recommend · 5 warn
Data Quality
High
Reviews
65
Reviewers
48
Best for:
Privacy-focused users who want a trustworthy VPN
Linux users who want a VPN that plays nicely with their setup
People who value audits, transparency, and anonymous payment options
IVPN has a really solid reputation as a privacy-first VPN, and it often gets mentioned in the same breath as other “trusted” names like Mullvad and Proton. People like it for being straightforward, ta...
Approval Rate
58%
63 recommend · 46 warn
Data Quality
High
Reviews
159
Reviewers
128
Best for:
People who want a cheaper VPN that still feels full-featured
Torrenters who want port forwarding
Folks who use multiple devices (Windows, Android, macOS, Linux) and want one VPN for all of them
Users who prefer a VPN with a long history and lots of community familiarity
Private Internet Access (PIA) has a long-time fan base and a reputation for being a solid “everyday VPN” that’s usually easy to live with. People like that it’s affordable, works across Windows, Andro...
Performance by Use Case
| Use Case | IVPN | Winner | Private Internet Access |
|---|---|---|---|
| Streaming | 100% (3) | ← | 67% (9) |
| Torrenting | - | → | 63% (8) |
| Privacy | 93% (45) | ← | 46% (64) |
| Censorship | 0% (4) | → | 25% (4) |
| Work | - | → | 0% (3) |
| Router | - | → | 100% (2) |
| Mobile | - | - | 100% (1) |
| Price | -- (2) | → | 86% (12) |
IVPN
Strengths
- Strong privacy and trust focus
- Good Linux support
- Open-source friendly vibe
- Anonymous payment options
- Helpful customer support
Weaknesses
- Not the cheapest option
- Not the best choice for streaming-first needs
- Doesn’t work reliably in Russia for bypassing restrictions
- Some skepticism about how it’s promoted online
Private Internet Access
Strengths
- Good value for the price
- Generally easy to use on Windows and Android
- No-logs track record people point to
- Linux support (especially with the GUI app)
- Port forwarding and torrent-friendly features
Weaknesses
- Ownership and trust concerns (Kape)
- US jurisdiction makes some people uneasy
- Some reports of slower speeds or worse reliability over time
- macOS app/daemon can be glitchy
- Linux command-line experience can be frustrating