CyberGhost vs Mozilla VPN
Side-by-side comparison based on Reddit & Twitter discussions
Community Pick
Mozilla VPN
Based on community sentiment and discussions
Approval Rate
26%
11 recommend · 31 warn
Data Quality
High
Reviews
87
Reviewers
82
Best for:
People who want a simple VPN for browsing and streaming
Anyone who wants an affordable VPN that’s easy to set up
Casual users who don’t need lots of advanced controls
CyberGhost generally comes across as a solid “set it and forget it” VPN that does the basics well. People often say it’s easy to use, works fine for everyday browsing, and is good enough for streaming...
Mozilla VPN
Winner
Approval Rate
100%
3 recommend · 0 warn
Data Quality
Low
Reviews
9
Reviewers
9
Best for:
People who want a simple VPN they don’t have to think about
Everyday privacy on public Wi‑Fi
Linux users who want basic VPN protection without tinkering
Fans of Mozilla who prefer a familiar brand
Mozilla VPN tends to get talked about as a “keep it simple” VPN that’s easy to live with day to day. People who like it often mention that it feels straightforward and beginner-friendly, and it gets a...
Performance by Use Case
CyberGhost
Strengths
- Easy to use apps
- Good for basic browsing
- Works well for streaming
- Decent speeds for everyday use
- Often feels budget-friendly
Weaknesses
- Occasional outages or login issues
- Ownership concerns for privacy-minded people
- Not as many advanced settings as some competitors
- Can be frustrating if you need always-on reliability for work
Mozilla VPN
Strengths
- Very easy to use
- Good “set it and forget it” feel
- Privacy-friendly branding and reputation
- Decent choice on Linux for basic VPN use
Weaknesses
- Can feel pricey for the feature set
- Not ideal for advanced per-tab/per-container routing
- Limited SOCKS5/proxy-style customization
- May disappoint power users who want more control