AdGuard VPN vs Mozilla VPN

Side-by-side comparison based on Reddit & Twitter discussions

Community Pick

AdGuard VPN

Based on community sentiment and discussions

Approval Rate
53%
16 recommend · 14 warn
Data Quality
High
Reviews
78
Reviewers
71
Best for:
People already using AdGuard who want everything in one ecosystem Anyone who wants simple ad blocking plus VPN in one switch Users who like DNS-based filtering and router-level blocking People who occasionally need help on restrictive networks
AdGuard VPN gets talked about a lot in the same breath as AdGuard’s ad blocker, and that’s really where it shines: it’s easy to turn on and forget, and people like how it pairs with ad blocking and DN...
Approval Rate
100%
3 recommend · 0 warn
Data Quality
Low
Reviews
9
Reviewers
9
Best for:
People who want a simple VPN they don’t have to think about Everyday privacy on public Wi‑Fi Linux users who want basic VPN protection without tinkering Fans of Mozilla who prefer a familiar brand
Mozilla VPN tends to get talked about as a “keep it simple” VPN that’s easy to live with day to day. People who like it often mention that it feels straightforward and beginner-friendly, and it gets a...

Performance by Use Case

Use Case AdGuard VPN Winner Mozilla VPN
Streaming 0% (1) - -
Torrenting -- (1) - -
Privacy 75% (32) 100% (5)
Censorship 67% (5) -
Gaming -- (1) - -
Work -- (1) - -
Router 0% (4) -
Mobile -- (1) - -
Price 100% (2) - -- (1)

AdGuard VPN

Strengths

  • Easy to use day-to-day
  • Pairs well with AdGuard ad blocking
  • Strong DNS filtering options
  • Useful for censorship-heavy networks
  • Works nicely with AdGuard Home/router setups

Weaknesses

  • Slow speeds for some people
  • Battery drain complaints on iOS
  • Crashes and connectivity issues (especially Android)
  • Doesn’t play nicely with other VPN apps
  • Trust and auditing questions

Mozilla VPN

Strengths

  • Very easy to use
  • Good “set it and forget it” feel
  • Privacy-friendly branding and reputation
  • Decent choice on Linux for basic VPN use

Weaknesses

  • Can feel pricey for the feature set
  • Not ideal for advanced per-tab/per-container routing
  • Limited SOCKS5/proxy-style customization
  • May disappoint power users who want more control