Kaspersky VPN vs Mozilla VPN
Side-by-side comparison based on Reddit & Twitter discussions
Community Pick
Kaspersky VPN
Based on community sentiment and discussions
Kaspersky VPN
Winner
Approval Rate
68%
17 recommend · 8 warn
Data Quality
High
Reviews
37
Reviewers
34
Best for:
People who already use Kaspersky and want an easy add-on VPN
Casual users who just want safer browsing on public Wi‑Fi
Android users who like turning VPN on for specific apps
Kaspersky VPN comes across as a solid “turn it on and it works” option for everyday browsing, especially if you already use Kaspersky antivirus. People like that it can be pretty cheap in bundles, and...
Approval Rate
100%
3 recommend · 0 warn
Data Quality
Low
Reviews
9
Reviewers
9
Best for:
People who want a simple VPN they don’t have to think about
Everyday privacy on public Wi‑Fi
Linux users who want basic VPN protection without tinkering
Fans of Mozilla who prefer a familiar brand
Mozilla VPN tends to get talked about as a “keep it simple” VPN that’s easy to live with day to day. People who like it often mention that it feels straightforward and beginner-friendly, and it gets a...
Performance by Use Case
| Use Case | Kaspersky VPN | Winner | Mozilla VPN |
|---|---|---|---|
| Streaming | -- (2) | ← | - |
| Torrenting | 50% (3) | ← | - |
| Privacy | 50% (9) | → | 100% (5) |
| Censorship | 100% (3) | ← | - |
| Gaming | 50% (2) | ← | - |
| Work | -- (1) | - | - |
| Price | 80% (6) | ← | -- (1) |
Kaspersky VPN
Strengths
- Good value when bundled with antivirus
- Simple to use for everyday browsing
- Works well on Android with per-app VPN options
- Often stable after recent updates
Weaknesses
- Not great for torrenting (no port forwarding)
- Can be inconsistent depending on updates/provider changes
- Account may be required for activation
- Occasional connection and network issues
Mozilla VPN
Strengths
- Very easy to use
- Good “set it and forget it” feel
- Privacy-friendly branding and reputation
- Decent choice on Linux for basic VPN use
Weaknesses
- Can feel pricey for the feature set
- Not ideal for advanced per-tab/per-container routing
- Limited SOCKS5/proxy-style customization
- May disappoint power users who want more control