IPVanish vs Mozilla VPN

Side-by-side comparison based on Reddit & Twitter discussions

Community Pick

IPVanish

Based on community sentiment and discussions

IPVanish Winner
Approval Rate
65%
31 recommend · 17 warn
Data Quality
Medium
Reviews
89
Reviewers
62
Promotional Content
33% may be promotional
Best for:
Firestick users who want a simple VPN for streaming People who want to hide browsing from their ISP on home or hotel Wi‑Fi Gamers who want a VPN that usually doesn’t bog things down
IPVanish comes up a lot as a solid, everyday VPN that feels fast and straightforward, especially for streaming and Firestick setups. People like it for basic privacy (keeping your ISP from seeing what...
Approval Rate
100%
3 recommend · 0 warn
Data Quality
Low
Reviews
9
Reviewers
9
Best for:
People who want a simple VPN they don’t have to think about Everyday privacy on public Wi‑Fi Linux users who want basic VPN protection without tinkering Fans of Mozilla who prefer a familiar brand
Mozilla VPN tends to get talked about as a “keep it simple” VPN that’s easy to live with day to day. People who like it often mention that it feels straightforward and beginner-friendly, and it gets a...

Performance by Use Case

Use Case IPVanish Winner Mozilla VPN
Streaming 75% (9) -
Privacy 47% (20) 100% (5)
Censorship 33% (5) -
Gaming 33% (3) - -
Travel 100% (1) - -
Mobile 100% (1) - -
Price 100% (4) -- (1)

IPVanish

Strengths

  • Fast speeds
  • Works well on Firestick
  • Good for everyday privacy
  • Feels like a fair price on longer plans
  • No-logs and audit info is reassuring to some

Weaknesses

  • Can be blocked in restrictive countries
  • Occasional routing/location weirdness
  • Some DNS/connection timeout issues
  • Customer support can feel unresponsive
  • Refund disputes when it doesn’t work for travel

Mozilla VPN

Strengths

  • Very easy to use
  • Good “set it and forget it” feel
  • Privacy-friendly branding and reputation
  • Decent choice on Linux for basic VPN use

Weaknesses

  • Can feel pricey for the feature set
  • Not ideal for advanced per-tab/per-container routing
  • Limited SOCKS5/proxy-style customization
  • May disappoint power users who want more control