Mozilla VPN vs Private Internet Access
Side-by-side comparison based on Reddit & Twitter discussions
Community Pick
Private Internet Access
Based on community sentiment and discussions
Approval Rate
100%
3 recommend · 0 warn
Data Quality
Low
Reviews
9
Reviewers
9
Best for:
People who want a simple VPN they don’t have to think about
Everyday privacy on public Wi‑Fi
Linux users who want basic VPN protection without tinkering
Fans of Mozilla who prefer a familiar brand
Mozilla VPN tends to get talked about as a “keep it simple” VPN that’s easy to live with day to day. People who like it often mention that it feels straightforward and beginner-friendly, and it gets a...
Private Internet Access
Winner
Approval Rate
58%
63 recommend · 46 warn
Data Quality
High
Reviews
159
Reviewers
128
Best for:
People who want a cheaper VPN that still feels full-featured
Torrenters who want port forwarding
Folks who use multiple devices (Windows, Android, macOS, Linux) and want one VPN for all of them
Users who prefer a VPN with a long history and lots of community familiarity
Private Internet Access (PIA) has a long-time fan base and a reputation for being a solid “everyday VPN” that’s usually easy to live with. People like that it’s affordable, works across Windows, Andro...
Performance by Use Case
| Use Case | Mozilla VPN | Winner | Private Internet Access |
|---|---|---|---|
| Streaming | - | → | 67% (9) |
| Torrenting | - | → | 63% (8) |
| Privacy | 100% (5) | → | 46% (64) |
| Censorship | - | → | 25% (4) |
| Work | - | → | 0% (3) |
| Router | - | → | 100% (2) |
| Mobile | - | - | 100% (1) |
| Price | -- (1) | → | 86% (12) |
Mozilla VPN
Strengths
- Very easy to use
- Good “set it and forget it” feel
- Privacy-friendly branding and reputation
- Decent choice on Linux for basic VPN use
Weaknesses
- Can feel pricey for the feature set
- Not ideal for advanced per-tab/per-container routing
- Limited SOCKS5/proxy-style customization
- May disappoint power users who want more control
Private Internet Access
Strengths
- Good value for the price
- Generally easy to use on Windows and Android
- No-logs track record people point to
- Linux support (especially with the GUI app)
- Port forwarding and torrent-friendly features
Weaknesses
- Ownership and trust concerns (Kape)
- US jurisdiction makes some people uneasy
- Some reports of slower speeds or worse reliability over time
- macOS app/daemon can be glitchy
- Linux command-line experience can be frustrating